SC-Homosexual-Ruling-Section-377-IPC
1) In a major setback to gay activists, the Supreme Court on 11 December, 2013 held that homosexuality or unnatural sex between two consenting adults would be an offence and this provision did not suffer from any constitutional infirmity. Which section of Indian Penal Code (IPC) was held constitutional by the Supreme Court in this ruling? – Section 377 (A Bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadaya in its judgment allowed a batch of appeals challenging the Delhi High Court judgment decriminalising Section 377 of IPC between two consenting adults. The court had reserved verdict on 27 March 2012 after marathon arguments since 15 February 2012 from counsel for the appellants, the Attorney General G. E. Vahanvati and others arguing for and against the judgment. The Bench while setting aside the High Court